Public companies › HEI
HEICO HEI · NYSE
Government aviation-parts contract record, attributed to 5 vendor units (CAGE codes) owned by HEICO. Data only; not investment advice.
$85.1M
obligated, last 52 weeks
+45%
vs prior 52 ($58.5M)
149
contract actions, 52 weeks
—
obligated, last 90 days
Outlook, next month
— No lean
Weeks like this one (356 cases) have not been followed by a consistent move either way: +0.1% versus the sector, ahead 49% of the time. Historical tendency of similar weeks, not a forecast and not advice.
Flow Score
week of 2026-09-21 · same for every reader · method and track recordContract flow this week: unusually weak · last month: flat · FAA directives: none
In primes and large-caps, weeks like this (356 cases since 2012) show no measurable effect: +0.1% over the next 20 trading days versus the aerospace ETF, ahead 49% of the time, against +0.1% in ordinary weeks.
A description of the current state of public contracting data and its measured history. Not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold anything.
Our current read
frozen September 23 · scored after 20 trading days (about October 21)
49% chance HEICO beats the aerospace sector over the next 20 trading days; expected excess move +0.1%. In words: about as likely as not to beat the sector.
Based on 360 comparable weeks since 2012 (same company size, same contract-flow level: unusually weak), pulled toward 50% when the evidence is thin. This number was written down on September 23 and cannot be changed; it is scored against the actual price when the horizon arrives.
Our record on HEI: no scored calls yet; the first score lands about four weeks after the first read.
A probability, not a recommendation. Every read we have ever made, and how it turned out, is on the research page.
How to read this, in plain terms
The idea. Every week the government signs contracts for aircraft parts, and we know which company won them. When a company suddenly wins far more than its usual week, a natural question is whether its stock tends to move in the weeks after. We measured that for every company on this site, every week since 2012, and this box reports what we found for weeks that look like the current one.
Outlook is the answer in three words. ▲ Leaning higher means that in past weeks like this one, stocks of this size usually went on to beat the aerospace sector over the following month, and did so often enough and by enough that it is unlikely to be chance. ▼ Leaning lower is the reverse. — No lean means the record shows no consistent move either way, which is the honest answer most weeks and for most of the largest companies.
Flow Score is the current week in words: whether this company's contract flow is unusually strong, normal or weak compared with its own past year; whether it is rising or falling over the last month; and whether the FAA has recently issued directives against its products.
What it is not. A tendency in past data, not a forecast, and not a recommendation. Sample sizes are shown so you can weigh it yourself; a lean built on 400 cases means more than one built on 40. Stocks move for many reasons that have nothing to do with parts contracts. Use this as one input, alongside everything else you know.
The weeks behind this outlook (356 comparable weeks; the 40 most recent shown)
Every week since 2012 in which a company of this size had contract flow in the same state as HEICO has now. “Next month” is how the stock did against the aerospace sector over the following 20 trading days.
| Week of | Company | Contract flow that week | vs. its normal | Next month |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-17 | HEICO | — | unusually weak | trailed by 1.6% |
| 2026-08-17 | TransDigm | — | far below | beat by 1.5% |
| 2026-08-17 | Honeywell | — | unusually weak | beat by 5.9% |
| 2026-08-17 | Boeing | — | unusually weak | beat by 2.7% |
| 2026-08-17 | Northrop Grumman | — | unusually weak | beat by 2.9% |
| 2026-08-10 | Textron (Bell, Cessna, Beechcraft) | — | unusually weak | beat by 6.8% |
| 2026-08-10 | TransDigm | — | far below | beat by 1.0% |
| 2026-08-10 | Honeywell | — | unusually weak | beat by 6.1% |
| 2026-08-10 | Northrop Grumman | — | unusually weak | beat by 3.3% |
| 2026-08-10 | HEICO | — | unusually weak | trailed by 5.4% |
| 2026-08-10 | Boeing | — | far below | beat by 1.7% |
| 2026-08-03 | L3Harris | — | unusually weak | trailed by 0.9% |
| 2026-08-03 | Northrop Grumman | — | unusually weak | beat by 3.5% |
| 2026-08-03 | HEICO | — | unusually weak | trailed by 3.0% |
| 2026-08-03 | Honeywell | — | unusually weak | trailed by 0.6% |
| 2026-08-03 | Boeing | — | far below | beat by 1.8% |
| 2026-08-03 | TransDigm | — | far below | beat by 4.4% |
| 2026-07-27 | Honeywell | — | unusually weak | trailed by 5.2% |
| 2026-07-27 | Northrop Grumman | — | unusually weak | beat by 5.9% |
| 2026-07-27 | HEICO | — | far below | trailed by 0.5% |
| 2026-07-27 | RTX (Raytheon, Pratt & Whitney, Collins) | — | far below | beat by 2.1% |
| 2026-07-27 | TransDigm | — | far below | beat by 3.4% |
| 2026-07-27 | Boeing | — | far below | trailed by 1.6% |
| 2026-07-27 | Parker-Hannifin | — | far below | beat by 6.9% |
| 2026-07-27 | Lockheed Martin | — | far below | beat by 4.1% |
| 2026-07-20 | TransDigm | — | far below | trailed by 4.6% |
| 2026-07-20 | HEICO | — | far below | trailed by 2.6% |
| 2026-07-20 | Boeing | — | far below | trailed by 0.9% |
| 2026-07-20 | Northrop Grumman | — | unusually weak | beat by 2.7% |
| 2026-07-20 | Honeywell | — | far below | trailed by 8.3% |
| 2026-07-20 | L3Harris | — | unusually weak | trailed by 11.7% |
| 2026-07-20 | RTX (Raytheon, Pratt & Whitney, Collins) | $24K | unusually weak | trailed by 1.2% |
| 2026-07-20 | Parker-Hannifin | — | far below | beat by 9.2% |
| 2026-07-13 | Boeing | — | far below | trailed by 0.0% |
| 2026-07-13 | Parker-Hannifin | — | far below | trailed by 1.1% |
| 2026-07-13 | GE Aerospace (incl. CFM International) | — | unusually weak | trailed by 2.1% |
| 2026-07-13 | Honeywell | — | far below | trailed by 11.1% |
| 2026-07-13 | L3Harris | — | unusually weak | trailed by 9.3% |
| 2026-07-13 | Northrop Grumman | — | far below | beat by 4.5% |
| 2026-07-13 | HEICO | — | far below | beat by 1.9% |
HEICO itself, in this state before: 16 weeks, beat the sector 31% of the time, -0.4% on average.
One square per past week, most recent first; green beat the sector, red trailed. Hover for the week and the number. Too few squares to lean on is a fair reading; the size-class record above is the larger sample.
Did big contract weeks lead anywhere? The last two years
Each week's contract flow (line) and what the stock then did over the following month compared with the aerospace sector (bars).
What to look for: if the dots are usually followed by green bars, big contract weeks have tended to lead somewhere for this company; if the bars under the dots are as often red as green, they have not.
Weekly obligations, this year against last
FPDS aviation-parts actions, all agencies, by signing week.
Units that win
- ROBERTSON FUEL SYSTEMS, L.L.C. 1T765$68.4M · 15
- SEAL DYNAMICS LLC 5N582$16.5M · 130
- JETSEAL, INC. 0HRD8$202K · 4
- TURBINE KINETICS, INC 085X4— · 0
- RADIANT POWER CORP 1MXA1— · 0
What they win, by supply class
- 1680 MISCELLANEOUS AIRCRAFT ACCESSORIES AND COMPONENTS$75.4M · 32
- 1560 AIRFRAME STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS$4.4M · 20
- 2940 ENGINE AIR AND OIL FILTERS, STRAINERS, AND CLEANERS, NONAIRCRAFT$2.5M · 37
- 2945 ENGINE AIR AND OIL FILTERS, CLEANERS, AIRCRAFT PRIME MOVING$1.3M · 3
- 1660 AIRCRAFT AIR CONDITIONING, HEATING, AND PRESSURIZING EQUIPMENT$595K · 10
- 2840 GAS TURBINES AND JET ENGINES, AIRCRAFT, PRIME MOVING; AND COMPONENTS$311K · 13
- 2915 ENGINE FUEL SYSTEM COMPONENTS, AIRCRAFT AND MISSILE PRIME MOVERS$176K · 5
- 2910 ENGINE FUEL SYSTEM COMPONENTS, NONAIRCRAFT$174K · 3
- 2990 MISCELLANEOUS ENGINE ACCESSORIES, NONAIRCRAFT$129K · 8
- 1650 AIRCRAFT HYDRAULIC, VACUUM, AND DE-ICING SYSTEM COMPONENTS$48K · 9
Latest contract actions
Each row is one FPDS action. Click the stock number for its page, the part number for sellers, the unit for its vendor record, or the PIID for the award on FPDS. $0 is a modification that moved no money.
| Signed | Agency | Item | NSN | Unit | Obligated | Record |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-25 | DEPT OF DEFENSE | 8512201010 INSULATION,THERMAL, | — | 5N582 | $5K | FPDS → |
| 2026-06-24 | DEPT OF DEFENSE | 8512012427 MUFFLER,EXHAUST | — | 5N582 | $9K | FPDS → |
| 2026-06-23 | DEPT OF DEFENSE | 8512173718 SWITCH,AIRCRAFT,MAT | — | 5N582 | $39K | FPDS → |
| 2026-06-23 | DEPT OF DEFENSE | 8512193186 INSULATION PIPE COV | — | 5N582 | $11K | FPDS → |
| 2026-06-23 | DEPT OF DEFENSE | 8511422308 FILTER ELEMENT,INTA | — | 5N582 | — | FPDS → |
| 2026-06-22 | DEPT OF DEFENSE | 8512064496 FILTER ELEMENT,INTA | — | 5N582 | $316K | FPDS → |
| 2026-06-22 | DEPT OF DEFENSE | 8512193246 SHIELD,HEAT,FLAP,CO | — | 5N582 | $167K | FPDS → |
| 2026-06-17 | DEPT OF DEFENSE | 8512152179 RING AND SEAL ASSEM | — | 5N582 | $11K | FPDS → |
| 2026-06-16 | DEPT OF DEFENSE | DISPLAY ELECTRONIC, | — | 5N582 | $0 | FPDS → |
| 2026-06-12 | DEPT OF DEFENSE | 8512148306 SHAFT ASSEMBLY,LIMI | — | 5N582 | $5K | FPDS → |
| 2026-06-08 | DEPT OF DEFENSE | 8512162950 SHUTOFF VALVE,ASSEM | — | 5N582 | $40K | FPDS → |
| 2026-06-08 | DEPT OF DEFENSE | DISPLAY ELECTRONIC, | — | 5N582 | $0 | FPDS → |
| 2026-06-02 | DEPT OF DEFENSE | 8512148080 FILTER ASSY,AIR CON | — | 5N582 | $183K | FPDS → |
| 2026-06-02 | DEPT OF DEFENSE | 8512156011 RETAINER BRACKET | — | 5N582 | $6K | FPDS → |
| 2026-06-01 | DEPT OF DEFENSE | 8512151914 STRAINER ASSEMBLY | — | 5N582 | $99K | FPDS → |
| 2026-06-01 | DEPT OF DEFENSE | 8512148306 SHAFT ASSEMBLY,LIMI | — | 5N582 | $27K | FPDS → |
| 2026-05-29 | DEPT OF DEFENSE | 8512104559 ACTUATOR,ELECTRO-ME | — | 5N582 | $0 | FPDS → |
| 2026-05-29 | DEPT OF DEFENSE | 8511633385 STRAINER ASSEMBLY | — | 5N582 | $0 | FPDS → |
| 2026-05-28 | DEPT OF DEFENSE | 8512098745 INSULATION BLANKET, | — | 5N582 | $7K | FPDS → |
| 2026-05-26 | DEPT OF DEFENSE | DISPLAY ELECTRONIC, | — | 5N582 | $6.7M | FPDS → |
Plus 108 DLA contracts in the last 30 days, $6.4M in contract value (DIBBS award history, counted per contract).
FAA Airworthiness Directives naming their products, 12 months
None in the last 12 months, or this company does not hold a type certificate.
In the news
No headlines in our feeds in the last 60 days.
Attribution is by vendor name against a curated map of listed parents and known subsidiaries; joint ventures and recent acquisitions can be missed. Obligations are FPDS aviation-parts actions above the micro-purchase threshold, by signing date. This page is a record of public contracting data. It is not investment advice and PartsAndPlanes makes no recommendation about any security.
Get the daily Market Pulse
New DLA RFQs, SAM.gov notices, yesterday's awards and FAA directives, weekday mornings. Free, one click to leave.