Public companies › HII

Huntington Ingalls HII · NYSE

Government aviation-parts contract record, attributed to 0 vendor units (CAGE codes) owned by Huntington Ingalls. Data only; not investment advice.

—

obligated, last 52 weeks

—

vs prior 52 (—)

0

contract actions, 52 weeks

—

obligated, last 90 days

Outlook, next month

— No lean

Weeks like this one (6266 cases) have not been followed by a consistent move either way: +0.0% versus the sector, ahead 50% of the time. Historical tendency of similar weeks, not a forecast and not advice.

Flow Score

week of 2026-09-21 · same for every reader · method and track record

Contract flow this week: normal · last month: flat · FAA directives: none

In primes and large-caps, weeks like this (6266 cases since 2012) show no measurable effect: +0.0% over the next 20 trading days versus the aerospace ETF, ahead 50% of the time, against +0.1% in ordinary weeks.

A description of the current state of public contracting data and its measured history. Not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold anything.

How to read this, in plain terms

The idea. Every week the government signs contracts for aircraft parts, and we know which company won them. When a company suddenly wins far more than its usual week, a natural question is whether its stock tends to move in the weeks after. We measured that for every company on this site, every week since 2012, and this box reports what we found for weeks that look like the current one.

Outlook is the answer in three words. ▲ Leaning higher means that in past weeks like this one, stocks of this size usually went on to beat the aerospace sector over the following month, and did so often enough and by enough that it is unlikely to be chance. ▼ Leaning lower is the reverse. — No lean means the record shows no consistent move either way, which is the honest answer most weeks and for most of the largest companies.

Flow Score is the current week in words: whether this company's contract flow is unusually strong, normal or weak compared with its own past year; whether it is rising or falling over the last month; and whether the FAA has recently issued directives against its products.

What it is not. A tendency in past data, not a forecast, and not a recommendation. Sample sizes are shown so you can weigh it yourself; a lean built on 400 cases means more than one built on 40. Stocks move for many reasons that have nothing to do with parts contracts. Use this as one input, alongside everything else you know.

The weeks behind this outlook (6266 comparable weeks; the 40 most recent shown)

Every week since 2012 in which a company of this size had contract flow in the same state as Huntington Ingalls has now. “Next month” is how the stock did against the aerospace sector over the following 20 trading days.

Week ofCompanyContract flow that weekvs. its normalNext month
2026-08-17Huntington Ingalls—about normalbeat by 0.1%
2026-08-17GE Aerospace (incl. CFM International)$884Kabout normalbeat by 0.1%
2026-08-17L3Harris$93Kabout normalbeat by 0.9%
2026-08-10Huntington Ingalls—about normalbeat by 2.3%
2026-08-10GE Aerospace (incl. CFM International)$3.0Mabout normalbeat by 1.0%
2026-08-03Textron (Bell, Cessna, Beechcraft)$500Kabout normalbeat by 2.3%
2026-08-03Huntington Ingalls—about normaltrailed by 0.2%
2026-07-27Huntington Ingalls—about normalbeat by 2.8%
2026-07-27L3Harris$63.2Mabout normalbeat by 2.8%
2026-07-20Textron (Bell, Cessna, Beechcraft)$53.2Mabout normaltrailed by 2.8%
2026-07-20Huntington Ingalls—about normalbeat by 5.7%
2026-07-13Huntington Ingalls—about normalbeat by 5.9%
2026-07-06Huntington Ingalls—about normalbeat by 11.2%
2026-06-29L3Harris$37.8Mabout normaltrailed by 7.8%
2026-06-29Huntington Ingalls—about normalbeat by 4.5%
2026-06-22Boeing$153.4Mabout normalbeat by 3.4%
2026-06-22Huntington Ingalls—about normalbeat by 17.0%
2026-06-22Northrop Grumman$34.0Mabout normalbeat by 5.2%
2026-06-22Textron (Bell, Cessna, Beechcraft)$23.6Mabout normaltrailed by 2.9%
2026-06-22HEICO$172Kabout normalbeat by 0.8%
2026-06-22TransDigm$1.2Mabout normaltrailed by 2.2%
2026-06-22RTX (Raytheon, Pratt & Whitney, Collins)$32.9Mabout normalbeat by 14.1%
2026-06-22Lockheed Martin$168.6Mabout normalbeat by 12.4%
2026-06-22GE Aerospace (incl. CFM International)$23.8Mabout normaltrailed by 2.8%
2026-06-15Boeing$154.3Mabout normaltrailed by 5.9%
2026-06-15Huntington Ingalls—about normalbeat by 1.8%
2026-06-15Leidos$3.1Mabout normalbeat by 4.9%
2026-06-15General Dynamics (Gulfstream)$22Kabout normalbeat by 10.5%
2026-06-15Parker-Hannifin$3.5Mabout normalbeat by 1.7%
2026-06-15L3Harris$262Kabout normalbeat by 3.5%
2026-06-15Textron (Bell, Cessna, Beechcraft)$863Kabout normalbeat by 6.8%
2026-06-15RTX (Raytheon, Pratt & Whitney, Collins)$46.5Mabout normalbeat by 12.2%
2026-06-15Honeywell$30.9Mabout normalbeat by 2.4%
2026-06-15Lockheed Martin$77.3Mabout normalbeat by 14.8%
2026-06-15GE Aerospace (incl. CFM International)$24.0Mabout normaltrailed by 5.4%
2026-06-15Northrop Grumman$447.7Mabout normalbeat by 5.2%
2026-06-15TransDigm$2.9Mabout normaltrailed by 9.1%
2026-06-08Textron (Bell, Cessna, Beechcraft)$17.1Mabout normalbeat by 3.7%
2026-06-08Northrop Grumman$703Kabout normaltrailed by 0.2%
2026-06-08Huntington Ingalls—about normaltrailed by 4.4%

Huntington Ingalls itself, in this state before: 745 weeks, beat the sector 54% of the time, +0.2% on average.

One square per past week, most recent first; green beat the sector, red trailed. Hover for the week and the number. Too few squares to lean on is a fair reading; the size-class record above is the larger sample.

Did big contract weeks lead anywhere? The last two years

Each week's contract flow (line) and what the stock then did over the following month compared with the aerospace sector (bars).

Blue line: how much government contract money the company won that week, compared with its own usual week. Dots are the weeks that counted as unusually strong.
Green bar: in the month after that week, the stock did better than the aerospace sector.
Red bar: it did worse. Grey: that month is not over yet.

What to look for: if the dots are usually followed by green bars, big contract weeks have tended to lead somewhere for this company; if the bars under the dots are as often red as green, they have not.

Weekly obligations, this year against last

FPDS aviation-parts actions, all agencies, by signing week.

Units that win

    What they win, by supply class

    • No actions in the last 52 weeks.

    Latest contract actions

    Each row is one FPDS action. Click the stock number for its page, the part number for sellers, the unit for its vendor record, or the PIID for the award on FPDS. $0 is a modification that moved no money.

    SignedAgencyItemNSNUnitObligatedRecord

    FAA Airworthiness Directives naming their products, 12 months

    None in the last 12 months, or this company does not hold a type certificate.

    In the news

    No headlines in our feeds in the last 60 days.

    Attribution is by vendor name against a curated map of listed parents and known subsidiaries; joint ventures and recent acquisitions can be missed. Obligations are FPDS aviation-parts actions above the micro-purchase threshold, by signing date. This page is a record of public contracting data. It is not investment advice and PartsAndPlanes makes no recommendation about any security.

    Get the daily Market Pulse

    New DLA RFQs, SAM.gov notices, yesterday's awards and FAA directives, weekday mornings. Free, one click to leave.